Pages

Subscribe Twitter Twitter
Showing posts with label ayodhya verdict news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ayodhya verdict news. Show all posts

Thursday, 30 September 2010

Ayodhya:Judges say divide disputed land into 3


The Allahabad High Court on Thursday ruled by a majority verdict that the disputed land in Ayodhya be divided equally into three parts among Hindus and Muslims and that the place where the makeshift temple of Lord Ram exists belongs to Hindus.

One-third portion will go to Hindus (a third for Ram Lalla), another one-third to Muslims(one-third for the Waqf Board) and the last one-third to the other (a third for the Nirmohi Akhara), until then, the land will remain in the custody of the federal government.

The court said in its verdict the issue between the Hindus and Muslims should be resolved through negotiations between the two sides.

The controversial land of Babri Masjid will remain in possession of the federation, as the case of Sunni Board has been dismissed, according to media reports, 'The Sunni Waqf Board says it will appeal in the Supreme Court against the Ayodhya verdict delivered today in Lucknow.'

In the separate judgements on the sensitive 60-year old title dispute on Ramjanambhoomi-Babri Masjid structure, Justices S U Khan and Sudhir Agarwal said that the area under the central dome of the three-domed structure where Lord Ram's idol exists belongs to Hindus.

Justices Khan and Agarwal decreed that the 2.7 acre land comprising the disputed site should be divided three equal parts and be given to Sunni Waqf Board, and the party representing 'Ram Lala Virajman' (Ram deity).

However, the third judge Justice D V Sharma ruled that that the disputed site is the birth place of Lord Ram and that the disputed building constructed by Mughal emperor Babur was built against the tenets of Islam and did not have the character of the mosque.

Justice Khan said "all the three sets of parties, i.e. Muslims, Hindus and Nirmohi Akhara are declared joint title holders of the property/premises in dispute as described by letters A B C D E F in the map Plan-I prepared by Shri Shiv Shankar Lal, Pleader/Commissioner appointed by court in Suit No. 1 to the extent of 1/3rd share each for using and managing the same for worshipping. A preliminary decree to this effect is passed.


According to media, the judges who gave the verdict tendered the resignation.

Tuesday, 28 September 2010

SC lifts stay, paves way for Ayodhya verdict on Sept 30


NEW DELHI: Paving the way for the Allahabad High Court to deliver its judgement in the 60-year-old Ramjanambhoomi- Babri Masjid title suit, the Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the plea for deferment of the verdict.

The apex court did not fix any date for the Allahabad High Court to give the verdict. It also did not specify any reason for its decision not to fix any date for the judgement to be delivered by the high court. However, the high court will pronounce the verdict on September 30 at 3.30 pm.

The officer on special duty in the high Court, Hari Shankar Dubey said that the three-judge special bench comprising Justice S.U Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and D.V Sharma would pronounce the verdict on September 30 at 15.30 hours.

Read more: SC rejects plea to defer verdict on Ayodhya title suit case - The Times of India

Related story: Ayodhya verdict .
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...